PHIL
3440: Cognitive
Science Ron
Mallon
Topics
2.
Write
a 5-7 page, double-spaced paper on a topic of your choice. Here are some suggestions.
Instructions:
(1) Papers may be on any
topic of your choosing, but they should substantially engage the classroom
readings and discussion. Topics below are suggestions. If youÕd
like to discuss your paper topic [recommended if you are not writing on one of
the topics below], feel free to contact me during my office hours or via email
at rmallon@philosophy.utah.edu.
(2) Papers should be original. Plagiarism will
result in a punishment not to exceed a failing grade for the course.
(Note also that work produced for another course cannot be submitted for this
one.)
(3) Papers are DUE Monday December 11, 2006 in 341 OSH.
Some advice:
(1) Your paper should have an argument that you
introduce, present, and conclude.
(2) It's often easier to start with a position you
disagree with.
(3) Considering objections to your view will enhance
the quality of your written work and your thinking.
(4) Rewrite, rewrite, rewrite.
1. Jerry Fodor argues that central systems are not modular. Explain his argument, and assess it in light of work by Frank Keil, Alan Leslie, or Jonathan Haidt.
2. Consider one or more experiments by Keil or Leslie, and assess whether the experiments show what they claim they do. If they do not, consider whether a different experiment might resolve the issue.
3. Evolutionary Psychologists claim the mind is comprised largely of special purpose mechanisms that are adaptive specializations for solving particular problems. David Buller questions this thesis. Who is right?
4. Jonathan Haidt suggests that much of our mental activity is subserved by unconscious processes, and he suggests that much of our reasoning is simply a form of rationalization. Explain his view and consider whether the experimental evidence supports it.
5. Consider how Leslie's account of the "Theory of Mind Mechanism" relates to Haidt's account of explaining ourselves.